Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069824›Full record

SynthesisBiomedical engineering online2025

Sex differences in electrical activity of the brain during sleep: a systematic review of electroencephalographic findings across the human lifespan.

Rhea Chapman, Sarasa Najima, Thaisa Tylinski Sant'Ana, Christy Chi Kiu Lee, Francesco Filice, Jessica Babineau, Tatyana Mollayeva

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rhea Chapman *KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue 11th Floor, Rm 11-183, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0213-3589
Sarasa Najima *KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue 11th Floor, Rm 11-183, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6392-1264
Thaisa Tylinski Sant'AnaKITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue 11th Floor, Rm 11-183, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8889-2112
Christy Chi Kiu LeeKITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue 11th Floor, Rm 11-183, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3097-0294
Francesco FiliceKITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue 11th Floor, Rm 11-183, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9852-0556
Jessica BabineauLibrary and Information Services, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4770-0579
Tatyana MollayevaKITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue 11th Floor, Rm 11-183, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada. tatyana.mollayeva@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2787-1848

Funding

Canada Research Chairs Program for Neurological Disorders and Brain Health CRC-2021-00074Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Alzheimer's Association, and the Alzheimer's Society UK Pilot Award for Global Brain Health Leaders GBHI ALZ UK-23-971123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the explosion of techniques for recording electrical brain activity, our recognition of neurodiversity has expanded significantly. Yet, uncertainty exists regarding sex differences in electrical activity during sleep and whether these differences, if any, are associated with social parameters. We synthesised existing evidence applying the PROGRESS-Plus framework, which captures social parameters that may influence brain activity and function.

methodsWe searched five databases from inception to December 2024, and included English language peer-reviewed research examining sex differences in electrical activity during sleep in healthy participants. We performed risk of bias assessment following recommended criteria for observational studies. We reported results on sex differences by wave frequency (delta, theta, alpha, sigma, beta, and gamma) and waveforms (spindle and sawtooth), positioning results across age-related developmental stages. We created visualizations of results linking study quality and consideration of PROGRESS-Plus parameters, which facilitated certainty assessment.

resultsOf the 2,783 unique citations identified, 28 studies with a total of 3,374 participants (47% male, age range 4-5 months to 101 years) were included in data synthesis. Evidence of high certainty reported no sex differences in alpha and delta relative power among participants in middle-to-late adulthood. Findings of moderate certainty suggest no sex differences in alpha power; and theta, sigma and beta relative power; and delta density. There is evidence of moderate certainty suggesting that female participants had a steeper delta wave slope and male participants had greater normalized delta power. Evidence that female participants have higher spindle power density is of low certainty. All other findings were regarded as very low in certainty. The PROGRESS-Plus parameters were rarely integrated into the methodology of studies included in this review.

conclusionEvidence on the topic of sex differences in sleep wave parameters is variable. It is possible that the reported results reflect unmeasured social parameters, instead of biological sex. Future research on sex differences in sleep should be discussed in relevance to functional or clinical outcomes. Development of uniform testing procedures across research settings is timely. PROSPERO: CRD42022327644.

fundingCanada Research Chairs (Neurological Disorders and Brain Health, CRC-2021-00074); UK Pilot Award for Global Brain Health Leaders (GBHI ALZ UK-23-971123).

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyElectrophysiological PhenomenaLongevitySex CharacteristicsSleepAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBrainEEGElectroencephalogramEquity, diversity, and inclusionHealth equityInequityIntegrated ethicsMethodNeurobiologyNeurodiversityNeuroimagingPROGRESS-Plus (Place of residence, Race/ethnicity, Occupation, Gender/Sex, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, Social capital; other contextual parameters, including age)Sex differencesSleep stagesSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID40069824
PMCPMC11899717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.