Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069815›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

Elastic stable intramedullary nails compared to locking compression plates for treating unstable distal ulnar fractures in adults: a prospective comparative study.

Chaode Cen, Daqing He, Aixin Cao, Yuehua Xie, Chaoran Hu, Yongfei Cao

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Elastic intramedullary nailing: a viable solution to stabilise adult humeral diaphyseal fractures? A systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chaode CenDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Guizhou Hospital, Guiyang, 550014, China.
Daqing HeDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Weining Yi, Hui and Miao Autonomous County, Bijie, 553100, China.
Aixin CaoSchool of Clinical Medicine, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121000, China.
Yuehua XieDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Weining Yi, Hui and Miao Autonomous County, Bijie, 553100, China.
Chaoran HuDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Guizhou Hospital, Guiyang, 550014, China.
Yongfei CaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Guizhou Hospital, Guiyang, 550014, China. 841523920@qq.com.

Funding

Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Department Qian Ke He Ji Chu-ZK[2024] General 579Health Commission of Guizhou Province gzwkj2025-209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDistal ulna fractures often occur in conjunction with distal radius fractures and other associated injuries. Currently, there are no satisfactory internal fixation systems available for addressing unstable distal ulna fractures, and a definitive consensus on the most effective treatment approach is still lacking. The objective of this research was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of using elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESIN) compared to locking compression plates (LCP) for treating unstable distal ulnar fractures in adults.

methodsIn a prospective clinical study, a total of 54 patients (21 females and 33 males; average age 49.3 years, ranging from 30 to 63 years) suffering from unstable or displaced fractures of the distal ulna were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups between January 2021 and August 2024. Specifically, 26 patients underwent treatment utilizing elastic stable intramedullary nails, whereas 28 patients were managed using locking compression plates. The two groups were evaluated prospectively for perioperative data and functional results.

resultsThe ESIN group comprised 26 patients, exhibiting a mean age of 48.27 years (with a range of 30 to 62 years), while the LCP group included 28 patients, whose mean age was 50.33 years (ranging from 32 to 63 years). Both groups were comparable regarding gender distribution, side of injury, mechanisms of injury, and classifications of fractures. However, there were significant differences noted in incision length of the ulna, surgical duration, frequency of fluoroscopy, and the rates of excellent and good functional outcomes as measured by the Gartland-Werley scores between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conversely, no significant differences were found concerning the time to union and the duration of immobilization between the two groups (P > 0.05).

conclusionESIN offers several advantages, including reduced incision length, lower frequency of fluoroscopy, shorter duration of the surgical procedure, decreased complication rates, and improved Gartland-Werly scores. Therefore, fixation using ESIN serves as an effective alternative for the treatment of distal ulnar fractures in adults. The minimally invasive nature and lower complication rates are defining characteristics of ESIN fixation.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone PlatesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryUlna FracturesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDistal ulna fractureElastic stable intramedullary nailLocking compression plateOpen reduction and internal fixation

Identifiers

PMID40069815
PMCPMC11900650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.