ArticleBMC nursing2025
Nursing contribution to end-of-life care decision-making in patients with neurological diseases on an acute hospital ward: documentation of signs and symptoms.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical Competence of Neuroscience Nurses in Inpatient Wards and Intensive Care Units: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience NursesPooled it
- End-of-Life Care in an Acute Neurological Ward: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Practices During the Last Week of Life.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience NursesObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecognizing impending death in patients with neurological diseases presents challenges for nurses and other healthcare professionals. This study aimed to identify nursing contribution to end-of-life (EOL) care decision-making for patients with neurological diseases in an acute hospital ward and to compare signs and symptoms among subgroups of patients.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 209 patient health records using the Neurological End-Of-Life Care Assessment Tool to evaluate the care in the last 3 to 7 days of life. Key aspects included the need for EOL care, EOL care decision-making, signs and symptoms of imminent death, and communication with relatives. The patient records pertain to patients who died in an acute neurological ward between January 2011 and August 2020; 123 with ischemic stroke, 48 with hemorrhagic stroke, 27 with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [ALS], and 11 with Parkinson's disease or extrapyramidal and movement disorders [PDoed]. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed to analyze the data.
resultsNurses identified the need for EOL care in 36% of cases and contributed to EOL decision-making as information brokers (15%), advocates (6%), and supporters (6%). They identified disease progression in 44% of the cases. The mean number of signs and symptoms in both the acute and progressive disease groups was 6.5 and ranged from 1 to 14. Patients with stroke without a documented EOL decision had more severe symptoms, including respiratory congestion (68%) and dyspnea (37%), than those with EOL decision. A higher frequency of no food intake was documented in patients with stroke receiving EOL care (p = 0.007) compared to those without. Among patients with ALS or PDoed, those with EOL decision showed a trend toward a higher frequency of unconsciousness or limited consciousness than those without EOL decision (p = 0.067). For all groups of patients, conversations with relatives occurred in 85% instances and family meetings in 93%.
conclusionsNurses made substantial contributions to EOL care decision-making for patients with neurological diseases. To improve early identification of imminent death in patients with neurological diseases in acute hospital wards, healthcare professionals must investigate barriers contributing to delayed recognition. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.