ReviewMovement ecology2025
A new data-driven paradigm for the study of avian migratory navigation.
Review in Movement ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Records of compass heading for long-distance ocean migrators show mid-ocean reorientation.Science advances · 2026Article
- Dissection of Behavioral Components and the Role of Omega/Delta Turns for the Chemotaxis of C. elegans.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Avian navigation has fascinated researchers for many years. Yet, despite a vast amount of literature on the topic it remains a mystery how birds are able to find their way across long distances while relying only on cues available locally and reacting to those cues on the fly. Navigation is multi-modal, in that birds may use different cues at different times as a response to environmental conditions they find themselves in. It also operates at different spatial and temporal scales, where different strategies may be used at different parts of the journey. This multi-modal and multi-scale nature of navigation has however been challenging to study, since it would require long-term tracking data along with contemporaneous and co-located information on environmental cues. In this paper we propose a new alternative data-driven paradigm to the study of avian navigation. That is, instead of taking a traditional theory-based approach based on posing a research question and then collecting data to study navigation, we propose a data-driven approach, where large amounts of data, not purposedly collected for a specific question, are analysed to identify as-yet-unknown patterns in behaviour. Current technological developments have led to large data collections of both animal tracking data and environmental data, which are openly available to scientists. These open data, combined with a data-driven exploratory approach using data mining, machine learning and artificial intelligence methods, can support identification of unexpected patterns during migration, and lead to a better understanding of multi-modal navigational decision-making across different spatial and temporal scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.