ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
CNV-mediated dysregulation of the ceRNA network mechanism revealed heterogeneity in diffuse and intestinal gastric cancers.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- LnCeVar 2.0: an updated resource and web tools for genomic variations disrupting ceRNA networks from single-cell/spatial transcriptomics data.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer (GC) is a highly heterogeneous tumour with high morbidity. Approximately 95% of GC cases are gastric adenocarcinomas, which are further categorized into two predominant subtypes: diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) and intestinal gastric cancer (IGC). These subtypes exhibit distinct pathophysiological and molecular characteristics, reflecting their unique tumorigenic mechanisms.
methodIn this study, we employed a comprehensive approach to identify driver genes associated with DGC and IGC by focusing on copy number variation (CNV) genes within the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network. The influence of driver CNV genes on the molecular, cellular, and clinical differences between DGC and IGC was subsequently analysed. Finally, therapeutic strategies for DGC and IGC were evaluated based on the status and functional pathways of the driver CNV genes.
resultsA total of 17 and 22 driver CNV genes were identified in DGC and IGC, respectively. These genes drive subtype differences through the ceRNA network, resulting in alterations in the tumour microenvironment (TME). Based on these differences, personalized treatment strategies for DGC or IGC could be developed. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may be an effective treatment option in IGC. Additionally, DGC patients with homozygous deletion of PPIF might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas those with high-level amplification of MTAP could respond to targeted therapy.
conclusionDriver CNV genes were identified to reveal the underlying cause of heterogeneity in DGC and IGC. Furthermore, specific driver CNV genes were identified as potential therapeutic targets, facilitating personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.