ArticleBMC public health2025
Colorectal cancer knowledge and screening awareness in Syria: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal cancer screening awareness among the Syrian population: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- The Effect of Negative Perfectionism on Hollow Syndrome in Medical Students: Serial Mediation of Self-Esteem and Achievement Motivation and Moderating Role of Subjective Well-Being.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Article
- Determinants of Colorectal Cancer: Risk Factors, Knowledge, and Diagnosis in a Cross-Sectional Study of Saudi Adults.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer globally, with rising incidence in developing countries due to lifestyle and dietary shifts. CRC often presents with late-stage symptoms, leading to higher mortality. Early detection through screening can significantly improve survival rates. In Syria, CRC is the second most common cancer, but screening rates remain low, especially following the decade-long war. This study aims to assess the knowledge of CRC and evaluate the awareness of CRC screening among Syrians to guide prevention and detection strategies.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted from September 27 to October 21, 2023, across six governorates: Damascus, Homs, Aleppo, Latakia, Hama, and Tartus, using a self-administered questionnaire distributed via social media. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v28.0, with a Chi-square test to explore differences in knowledge based on socio-demographical factors. Multicollinearity was assessed using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), and multinomial regression was performed to confirm relationships established by the Chi-square analysis.
resultsThe study included 772 participants, 42.6% of whom were aged 30-35 years. The majority were female (64.4%) and married (56.3%). Only 27.8% considered themselves informed about CRC. While 54.8% had heard of colonoscopy, only 15.4% had undergone the procedure. Significant knowledge gaps were identified, particularly regarding the link between adenocarcinoma polyps and CRC (29.9%), the role of diet (33.2%), and the protective effect of aspirin (17.7%). Individuals aged 50 and above demonstrated higher awareness levels, particularly in recognizing CRC's hereditary nature (p-value = 0.033) and the potential for cure (p-value = 0.012). Education and economic status were also strongly associated with better CRC knowledge, and males generally exhibited higher awareness than females.
conclusionThis study highlights significant gaps in CRC knowledge and screening awareness among Syrians, emphasizing the need to integrate education and complimentary screening into national health policies. Targeted campaigns, nonprofit collaboration, and media engagement are essential to bridge these gaps. Future research should address limitations like sampling bias and the cross-sectional design through longitudinal and comparative studies to guide tailored interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.