ArticleBMC biology2025
Acute and chronic pesticide exposure trigger fundamentally different molecular responses in bumble bee brains.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Species-specific brain transcriptomic responses to clothianidin and sulfoxaflor in pollinators.iScience · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic responses in ham mite (Tyrophagus putrescentiae) to propylene glycol exposure.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Metagenomic analysis of gut bacteria in different developmental instars ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Detecting local adaptation under weak genetic structure in an endemic damselfly: an integrative eco-evolutionary approach.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Dose-response-defined physiological framework enables comparative analysis of transcriptional response dynamics across multiple herbicides inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Pesticide and Pathogen Exposure Causes Idiosyncratic Gene Expression Responses Across Four Diverse North American Bumble Bee Species.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBeneficial insects, including pollinators, encounter various pesticide exposure conditions, from brief high-concentration acute exposure to continuous low-level chronic exposure. To effectively assess the environmental risks of pesticides, it is critical to understand how different exposure schemes influence their effects. Unfortunately, this knowledge remains limited. To clarify whether different exposure schemes disrupt the physiology of pollinators in a similar manner, we exposed bumble bees to acute or chronic treatments of three different pesticides: acetamiprid, clothianidin, or sulfoxaflor. Genome-wide gene expression profiling enabled us to compare the effects of these treatments on the brain in a high-resolution manner.
resultsThere were two main findings: First, acute and chronic exposure schemes largely affected non-overlapping sets of genes. Second, different pesticides under the same exposure scheme showed more comparable effects than the same pesticide under different exposure schemes. Each exposure scheme induced a distinct gene expression profile. Acute exposure mainly caused upregulation of genes linked to the stress response mechanisms, like peroxidase and detoxification genes, while chronic exposure predominantly affected immunity and energy metabolism.
conclusionsOur findings show that the mode of exposure is critical in determining the molecular effects of pesticides. These results signal the need for safety testing practices to better consider mode-of-exposure dependent effects and suggest that transcriptomics can support such improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.