Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069696›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

Addressing health equity during design and implementation of health system reform initiatives: a scoping review and framework.

Tristan Bouckley, David Peiris, Devaki Nambiar, Shraddha Mishra, Tushar Sood, Parnika Purwar, Adam G Elshaug, Bruce E Landon, Sallie-Anne Pearson, Carmen Huckel Schneider and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tristan BouckleyThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. tbouckley@georgeinstitute.org.au.
David PeirisThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Devaki NambiarThe George Institute for Global Health, Delhi, India.
Shraddha MishraThe George Institute for Global Health, Delhi, India.
Tushar SoodThe George Institute for Global Health, Delhi, India.
Parnika PurwarThe George Institute for Global Health, Delhi, India.
Adam G ElshaugCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Bruce E LandonDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Sallie-Anne PearsonSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Carmen Huckel SchneiderThe Leeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics and Data, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Gill SchierhoutThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research Council Partnership Projects grant 1198416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth equity is a commonly asserted goal of health systems. However, there is a limited understanding on how best to promote equity as a part of health system reform initiatives. We conducted a scoping review to (1) identify and characterise strategies that promote health equity during the design and implementation of health system reform initiatives; and (2) determine opportunities to strengthen health equity informed policy design and implementation processes and outcomes.

methodWe systematically searched peer-reviewed literature from 2013 to 2022 focussing on four search domains: (1) health equity; (2) implementation; (3) health system; and (4) reform, policy, or theories, and only included papers that represented a population health or system-wide intention. Health equity promoting strategies were categorised into those occurring at national, regional, state, or local levels. Themes common across system levels were mapped, which alongside theory, informed the development of a health equity promoting framework for reform initiatives.

resultsThe search returned 10,999 articles after duplicates were removed. 384 articles underwent full text review and 68 met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis of results identified health equity promoting themes derived from numerous strategies, with a median of 10 strategies (interquartile range 7,15) per article. Accountability, commitment, shared power, and adaptability emerged as some of the most prominent equity promoting themes applicable at all system levels. Across strategies, two cardinal conditions were identified: (1) the need for health equity implementation strategies to be made explicit, and (2) the need for alignment and complementarity of strategies. The framework developed demonstrates equity-oriented reform implementation, which embeds broader equity change throughout the system through inclusive and reflexive governance.

conclusionThis review synthesises diverse literature about how health equity has been considered across levels of the health system during reform design and implementation, providing to our knowledge, the first comprehensive multi-level approach to this issue. Our resulting framework presents policymakers, implementers, and researchers a novel cross-scholarship perspective and process to support the implementation of health equity within system reform initiatives. Throughout design and implementation, consistent vision and a coordinated approach for equity across system levels, underpinned by reflexive governance, will be vital to ensuring that those most in need of healthcare benefit equitably.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformHealth EquityHealth PolicyHumansHealth equityHealth systems reformImplementationScoping review

Identifiers

PMID40069696
PMCPMC11899096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.