Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069654›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Geographic variations and determinants of ever-tested for HIV among women aged 15-49 in Sierra Leone: a spatial and multi-level analysis.

Lovel Fornah, Mulugeta Shegaze Shimbre, Augustus Osborne, Alieu Tommy, Agumas Fentahun Ayalew, Wei Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lovel FornahSchool of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China. lfornah@ebkustsl.edu.sl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6457-3121
Mulugeta Shegaze ShimbreSchool of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5633-1309
Augustus OsborneInstitute for Development, IfD, Western Area, Freetown, Sierra Leone.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0226-841X
Alieu TommyDepartment of Epidemiology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Agumas Fentahun AyalewSchool of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China.
Wei MaSchool of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China. weima@sdu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV testing among women in sub-Saharan Africa varies widely, with Sierra Leone having lower rates than other countries. This study explores geographic variations and determinants of HIV testing among women aged 15-49 in Sierra Leone.

methodThe study utilized data from the 2008, 2013, and 2019 Sierra Leone Demographic Health Surveys, comprising 39,606 women aged 15-49. Spatial autocorrelation and Moran's I were used to analyze the distribution of this outcome, while mixed-effect multi-level binary logistic regression assessed the factors associated with ever-tested for HIV. The findings were reported as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsThis study found that 21.47% of the study population comprised young women aged 15-19, and 53.62% had no formal education. Ever tested for HIV drastically increased from 13% in 2008 to 56% in 2019. HIV testing hotspots expanded from the Western urban and rural areas in 2008 to include districts like Port Loko, Kambia, and Bo by 2019, with a national testing pooled prevalence of 45.5% [44.2, 46.8]. The pooled regression analysis shows that women aged 20-34 had higher odds of testing than those aged 15-19, while those aged 40-49 had lower odds. Higher education, marriage/cohabitation, media exposure, parity, sexual activity, recent healthcare visits, condom use, STI history, larger households, female-headed households, and higher wealth indices were associated with higher odds of testing. Testing odds were higher during the 2013 and 2019 survey years compared to 2008. Conversely, Muslims, women with challenges accessing healthcare, and those in rural areas had lower odds of being tested.

conclusionFrom 2008 to 2019, the rate of women aged 15-49 years ever tested for HIV showed a significant increase. The expansion of HIV testing hotspots highlights progress in geographic coverage, but disparities remain, particularly in rural areas. Younger women (aged 20-34) and those with higher education, wealth, or access to healthcare services were more likely to be tested, underscoring the influence of socioeconomic and structural factors on testing uptake. The lower odds of testing among older women and Muslims point to the need for targeted interventions addressing cultural barriers. Media exposure, parity, and sexual activity emphasize the role of reproductive health and awareness in promoting testing. Efforts to improve access to healthcare in rural areas and address logistical challenges, such as distance to health facilities, are critical for equitable HIV testing coverage. Strengthening community-based outreach and culturally sensitive programs could further close the gaps in testing uptake. The sustained increase in testing prevalence from 2008 to 2019 reflects progress but also highlights the need for continuous investment in HIV testing programs.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsHIV TestingAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedMultilevel AnalysisRural PopulationSierra LeoneSpatial AnalysisYoung AdultGeographical variationsHIV testingSpatial autocorrelation

Identifiers

PMID40069654
PMCPMC11895344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.