Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069649›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Media advocacy for farm safety and health: current landscape and future directions.

Pamela J Milkovich, Sarah Perez-Sanz, Kim Garcia, Pamela Mejia, Andrew Johnson, Julie A Sorensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pamela J MilkovichThe Northeast Center for Occupational Health and Safety: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, 1 Atwell Road, Cooperstown, NY, USA. pam.milkovich@bassett.org.
Sarah Perez-SanzMinnesota Department of Commerce, 85 7th Place East, Suite 280, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Kim GarciaBerkeley Media Studies Group, 2130 Center St, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Pamela MejiaBerkeley Media Studies Group, 2130 Center St, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Andrew JohnsonThe Northeast Center for Occupational Health and Safety: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, 1 Atwell Road, Cooperstown, NY, USA.
Julie A SorensenThe Northeast Center for Occupational Health and Safety: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, 1 Atwell Road, Cooperstown, NY, USA.

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS 5R01OH011668NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH011668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithin public health, media advocacy embraces the influence of new media and journalists in setting public agendas and promoting important public health programming and policies. Though occupational health and safety (OSH) is an important component of public health, few studies have examined the use of media advocacy within this specific field. This study aims to examine how media is currently used to support OSH efforts as well as opportunities for engaging with this strategy.

methodsLexisNexis and AgInjuryNews were used to collect news media pertaining to farm safety, and specifically tractor safety, published between 2018 and 2021 in Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska. A total of 372 news articles were identified. Content analysis was used to assess a random sample of these articles (n = 122) to answer the questions: (1) why are stories about farm and tractor safety in the news; (2) who speaks in the news about farm and tractor safety; (3) how are farming, farmers, and farm safety depicted in the news; (4) who is named as responsible for and called upon to take action to address farm and tractor safety issues; and (5) what solutions to address farm and tractor safety are mentioned?

resultsIn general, relevant news stories (n = 89) were published as a result of event (such as tractor overturns or safety days). Many stories placed responsibility for both farm injury events and the need to increase safety measures solely on farmers, demonstrating a missed opportunity for understanding how farm safety is impacted by the larger societal context, like legislation and government programs.

conclusionsUsing these findings, the authors provide several suggestions for OSH practitioners who hope to improve their use of media to advance farm safety agendas.

Indexed as

AgricultureConsumer AdvocacyFarmsMass MediaOccupational HealthHumansUnited StatesAgricultural safetyEthnographic content analysisMedia advocacyROPS

Identifiers

PMID40069649
PMCPMC11899040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.