ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Prognostic value of tumor deposits and positive lymph nodes in colorectal cancer surgery: improved staging for long-term prognosis.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Critical Examination of the Changes Proposed by the AJCCCCEP for the AJCC 9th Edition Colorectal Cancer Staging System.The American journal of surgical pathology · 2026Article
- Independent prognostic value of tumor deposits in stage III colorectal cancer: a large-scale systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Preoperative identification of tumor deposits in rectal cancer using a transformer-based multimodal fusion model: a multicenter retrospective study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Stratifying prognosis in stage III colorectal cancer patients: the role of tumor deposits and lymph node ratio.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the prognostic value of the presence and number of tumor deposits (TDs) and the combination of TDs and number of positive lymph nodes (PLNs) in patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery, and to modify N staging.
methodThe clinical data of 1470 patients with stage I-IV CRC who underwent surgery in Wuhan Union Hospital from February 2014 to May 2018 were collected. The optimal cutoff value for TD + PLNs was obtained using X-tile software, and patients were regrouped accordingly. Cox univariate and multivariate analysis were used to screen the factors affecting the prognosis of patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the predictive ability of independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients.
resultThe presence of TD was associated with poor OS (HR = 2.478, 95%CI: 1.794-3.422, P<0.001) and DFS (HR = 2.516, 95%Cl: 1.874-3.377, P<0.001). Combined with TD and PLNs, a total of 128 of 395 N1 patients were reclassified re-staged as N2(TD + PLNs ≥ 3), which had a worse prognosis than those diagnosed with N1. Compared with Tumor Node Metastasis stage and TD number, the multivariate model constructed using independent prognostic factors showed better predictive power for OS (AUC:0.769 vs. 0.681 vs. 0.650) and DFS (AUC:0.757 vs. 0.702 vs. 0.650).
conclusionTD significantly affects the long-term prognosis of CRC patients. Combining TD and PLNs to redefine the tumor staging of CRC patients can improve the accuracy of long-term prognosis of surgical patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.