Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069540›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2025

Trait-anxiety and belief updating: Exploring the role of negativity bias and contrast avoidance.

Guillermo Solovey, Alejandro Usaj, Soledad Picco, Juan Cruz Beron, Mariela Sued, María Eugenia Szretter Noste, Luz Bavassi, Maria E Pedreira, Rodrigo S Fernández

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guillermo SoloveyFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, UBA-CONICET, Instituto de Cálculo, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Alejandro UsajFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, UBA-CONICET, Instituto de Cálculo, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Soledad PiccoInstituto de Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIByNE)-CONICET, Instituto de Fisiología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan Cruz BeronInstituto de Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIByNE)-CONICET, Instituto de Fisiología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariela SuedFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, UBA-CONICET, Instituto de Cálculo, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María Eugenia Szretter NosteFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, UBA-CONICET, Instituto de Cálculo, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Luz BavassiInstituto de Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIByNE)-CONICET, Instituto de Fisiología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Maria E PedreiraInstituto de Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIByNE)-CONICET, Instituto de Fisiología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rodrigo S FernándezInstituto de Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIByNE)-CONICET, Instituto de Fisiología, Buenos Aires, Argentina. rodrigofernandez@fbmc.fcen.uba.ar.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2020 - 00956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beliefs play a crucial role in shaping our behaviors and mental health outcomes. Asymmetric belief updating refers to the phenomenon where desirable information is updated more readily than undesirable information. An essential feature of anxiety is threat-overestimation and a tendency to focus on the negative aspects of experience while avoiding sharp negative emotional contrasts. These two characteristics lead to different predictions concerning belief updating. One scenario would suggest a reduction in asymmetric update behavior, indicating negativity bias, whereas the other would indicate an increase in asymmetric update, indicating contrast avoidance. To test these two rival predictions, participants (n = 54) first completed trait-measures and then performed a belief update task. Moreover, memory for the information presented was assessed in the short-term and long-term. Skin conductance response was measured to assess arousal levels. Overall, our findings revealed that higher levels of trait-anxiety predicted a greater integration of desirable information but not undesirable information. Trait-intolerance of uncertainty did not exhibit an association with update behavior. Skin conductance and memory were not associated with trait-measures. We discuss these results in line with the Contrast Avoidance Model of anxiety in terms of avoidance of unexpected negative and positive contrasts induced by relief during belief updating.

Indexed as

AnxietyAvoidance LearningCultureAdolescentAdultArousalEmotionsFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansMaleUncertaintyYoung AdultAnxietyAvoidanceCognitive biasMemoryUpdating

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.