ArticleNeurology and therapy2025
Adjunctive Brivaracetam in People with Epilepsy and Intellectual Disability: Evidence from the BRIVAracetam Add-On First Italian netwoRk Study.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSubjects with intellectual disability are usually excluded from clinical trials and there is limited evidence-based guidance for the choice of antiseizure medications in this vulnerable population. The study explored the effectiveness of brivaracetam (BRV) in people with epilepsy and intellectual disability.
methodsBRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk Study (BRIVAFIRST) was a 12-month retrospective, multicenter study including adults prescribed adjunctive BRV. Main outcomes included the rates of seizure-freedom, seizure response (≥ 50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency), and treatment discontinuation. The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) was also considered. Analyses by the presence and severity of intellectual disability were performed.
resultsSubjects with intellectual disability were 253 (24.6%) out of 1029 participants. The 12-month rates of seizure freedom were 18.4% and 10.3% in participants without and with intellectual disability, respectively; the corresponding values for seizure response were 40.0% and 28.9%. Intellectual disability was not an independent predictor of seizure outcomes. The rates of treatment discontinuation were 25.8% and 26.4% in participants without and with intellectual disability. respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of any AEs, somnolence, nervousness/agitation, and aggressiveness by the presence and degree of intellectual disability.
conclusionBrivaracetam can be a suitable treatment option and offer opportunities for clinical improvement in subjects with intellectual disability and uncontrolled seizures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.