ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Clinical performance of long-term temporary fixed dental prostheses fabricated from CAD/CAM resin-based composite.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chairside Repair of Provisional Restorative Materials: Effects of Material Type, Repair Protocol, and Thermocycling on Shear Bond Strength.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mechanical Performance of 3D-Printed Resins versus CAD/CAM PMMA for Provisional Crowns: New Evidence under Simulated Clinical Conditions.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Effect of Thermal Aging on Color Stability and Mechanical Properties of High-Density CAD/CAM Polymers Utilized for Provisional Restorations.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the clinical performance of long-term temporary fixed dental prostheses (LTFDPs) manufactured from CAD/CAM temporary resin-based composite. MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective data of 46 patients supplied with 73 LTFDPs (partial coverage crowns, crowns, fixed dental prostheses) manufactured from a CAD/CAM resin-based composite luted either temporarily, selfadhsesively, or adhesively were analyzed for failures and complications.
resultsDatasets of 44 patients with 71 LTFDPs (12 partial-coverage crowns, 31 crowns, 28 fixed dental prostheses) were included in the analyses; median observation time was 362.0 days. Failures due to fracture occurred in 14.1% and decementation was observed in 18.1% of all LTFDPs. There was no statistically significant difference in failure rates between partial coverage crowns, crowns, and fixed dental prostheses. The probability of decementations was significantly higher in restorations that had been luted temporarily or selfadhesively than in those that had been luted adhesively.
conclusionsLTFDPs fabricated from resin-based temporary composite with low filler content feature relevant failure rates, which is independent on the type of restoration. Decementation is a frequently observed complication and dependent on the mode of luting. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LTFDPs fabricated from resin-based composite have similar failure rates as reported for polymethyl methacrylate based LTFPDs. Adhesive luting might help to reduce the probability of decementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.