ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
Decompressive craniectomy in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: can favorable outcome be achieved?
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: insights from a 15-year multicentre cohort in Sweden.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Successful conservative management for ruptured basilar artery perforator aneurysm associated with early hematoma expansion in right temporal lobe without aneurysm rerupture: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDecompressive craniectomy (DC) is a last-tier treatment for managing refractory intracranial hypertension in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), though concerns persist about whether it primarily prolongs survival in a state of severe disability. This study investigated patient characteristics, surgical indications, complications, and outcomes following DC in aSAH.
methodsIn this Swedish, retrospective multi-center study, 123 aSAH patients treated with DC between 2008-2022 were included. Data collection included demographic details, aSAH characteristics, injury severity, DC indication, complications, and outcome at roughly six months post-DC (modified Rankin scale [mRS]) dichotomized as survival vs. mortality (0-5 vs. 6) and favorable vs. unfavorable (0-3 vs. 4-6).
resultsThe median age was 53 years and 66% were females. Two thirds presented with a WFNS grade 4-5 and 83% with a Fisher grade 4 hemorrhage. Most aneurysms were located at the middle cerebral artery (65%) and treated with clip ligation (59%). DC significantly reduced midline shift from 9 to 2 mm and obliteration rates of basal cisterns from 95 to 22% (p < 0.05). Reoperation for hematomas or extension of the DC were rare (< 5%). At follow-up, 20% were deceased, while 33% had recovered favorably. In univariate logistic regressions, younger age was associated with favorable outcome and reduced mortality. Other patient demographics, injury severity, and factors related to the DC surgery lacked association with outcome.
conclusionsaSAH patients treated with DC presented with severe primary brain injuries and signs of intracranial hypertension. DC resulted in radiological improvements regarding mass effect and a low rate of postoperative complications. Although the results were based on a selected population of aSAH patients, an encouraging rate of favorable outcome was found, particularly among younger patients. However, the absence of additional outcome predictors underscores the ongoing challenges in improving patient selection for DC in aSAH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.