Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069474›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Assessment of intraorbital hydroxyapatite implant exposure beyond 10 years of implantation.

Xia Ding, Dai Su, Yuan Cao, Xiaowei Zhu, Yue Xing, Ming Lin, Jin Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xia DingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No.639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Dai SuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No.639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Yuan CaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No.639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Xiaowei ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No.639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Yue XingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No.639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Ming LinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No.639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China. linmingcn@163.com.
Jin LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No.639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China. abcd1971206@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5632-5774

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82401309the Fundamental research program funding of Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong university School of Medicine JYZZ214the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai 20DZ2270800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo analyze intraorbital Hydroxyapatite(HA) implant exposure occurring beyond ten years of implantation and suggest potential contributing factors.

designA retrospective cohort study based in the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital.

methodsOne hundred and one Chinese patients with HA implant exposure were identified, from which 38 patients with implants exposure after ten years of insertion were selected and analyzed for demographic and medical records, clinical manifestations, surgery type, implant size, exposure area, follow-up duration, complications, details regarding prosthesis care, and treatment methods. All of the removed implants were sent for an HE pathologic examination.

resultsThe 38 cases experienced exposure 10 to 19 years after implantation and presented to the clinic with increased secretions, proliferation of granulation tissue, visible suture exposure, and difficulty in wearing the external prosthesis. Other complications included implant forward position in 3 patients, eyelid retraction in 4 patients, and all the patients presented with post-enucleation socket syndrome. Reviewing the medical history, HA implant sizes ranged from 18 to 22 mm. Fourteen patients underwent implant repair surgery, of which 2 experienced recurrence, and ultimately, 26 implants were removed. Of the 26 removed implants, histologic examination showed that 17 exhibited chronic infection, and 12 had limited fibrovascular ingrowth. The questionnaires indicated that 26 patients did not renew the external prosthesis regularly.

conclusionThis study identified late complications and potential risk factors for implant exposure beyond ten years of implantation, including chronic infection, non-absorbable sutures, and low and delayed vascularization.

Indexed as

DurapatiteOrbitOrbital ImplantsPostoperative ComplicationsAdolescentAdultAgedBiocompatible MaterialsChildEye EnucleationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis ImplantationBiocompatible MaterialsDurapatiteHydroxyapatite implantLate exposureNon-absorbable sutureVascularization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.