Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069356›Full record

Trial reportMolecular psychiatry2025

Neuroimaging changes in major depression with brief computer-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy compared to waitlist.

Yvette I Sheline, Michael E Thase, Elizabeth A Hembree, Nicholas L Balderston, Frederick J Nitchie, Alexandra S Batzdorf, Walid Makhoul, Kevin G Lynch

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yvette I ShelineCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. sheline@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6929-9659
Michael E ThaseDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elizabeth A HembreeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nicholas L BalderstonCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8565-1544
Frederick J NitchieCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexandra S BatzdorfCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6110-2658
Walid MakhoulCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0035-5795
Kevin G LynchDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Novel neural circuit biomarkers of depression response to computer-augmented CBTR01MH110939 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELINE, YVETTE I · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110939U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01MH110939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goals of the current study were to determine the efficacy in major depressive disorder (MDD) of a shortened, computer-augmented cognitive behavioral therapy (CCBT) protocol and to determine brain plasticity effects following CCBT. Seventy-two MDD participants were randomized to CCBT or waitlist control groups and compared to 40 healthy controls (HCs). Functional MRI data were collected for all participants and repeated for patients following CCBT (five therapist-administered manualized CBT sessions plus computer training exercises). Linear mixed-effects models evaluated changes in depression scores throughout treatment and in connectivity from pre- to post-CCBT. Linear regression models compared connectivity differences between groups (MDD vs. HC). Following CCBT, there were decreases in MADRS and BDI (ps < 0.001); there was more negative connectivity of dlPFC with sgACC and DMN with sgACC (ps < 0.002); and there was more positive connectivity of FPN with nucleus accumbens, bilateral amygdalae, bilateral hippocampi, and sgACC and of DMN with ventral and dorsal bilateral anterior insulae (ps < 0.01). There were no associations between change in MADRS and change in connectivity; however, there was an association between change in BDI and change in FPN-sgACC connectivity (p = 0.01). A shortened CBT schedule coupled with home computer exercises was associated with decreased depression symptoms and augmented PFC connectivity with multiple subcortical regions. One possible mechanism of the CCBT intervention is modulating PFC connectivity with subcortical regions, influencing top-down control of affective processes dysregulated in MDD.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMajor Depressive DisorderTherapy, Computer-AssistedAdultBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingTreatment OutcomeWaiting Lists

Identifiers

PMID40069356
PMCPMC12240849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.