ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning based automatic quantification of aortic valve calcification on contrast enhanced coronary CT angiography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of aortic valve calcification quantification on contrast-enhanced computed tomography against ex vivo gravimetric analysis: comparison of fixed Hounsfield unit thresholds and deep learning segmentation.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Neural network assessment of aortic, iliac, renal, and mesenteric artery calcification in CTA: Normalized scoring framework and comparison to threshold-based method.Acta radiologica open · 2026Article
- The cyber-physical paradigm for lifetime aortic valve management: a synthesis of robotics, artificial intelligence, and augmented reality.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Valvular Heart Disease with Cardiac Imaging.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Incidental Finding of Coronary and Non-Coronary Artery Calcium: What Do Clinicians Need To Know?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Association Between AI-derived Thoracic Calcium Volume and Aortic Valve Calcification Quantified by Agatston Scoring.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantifying aortic valve calcification is critical for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis, predicting cardiovascular risk, and guiding treatment decisions. This study evaluated the feasibility of a deep learning-based automatic quantification of aortic valve calcification using contrast-enhanced coronary CT angiography and compared the results with manual calcium scoring. A retrospective analysis of 177 patients undergoing aortic stenosis evaluation was conducted, divided into a development set (n = 97) and an internal validation set (n = 80). The DeepLab v3 + model segmented the ascending aorta, and the XGBoost model refined the aortic valve region using representative attenuation values. Calcifications were identified with a tailored threshold based on these values and quantified using a weighted scoring method analogous to the Agatston score. The automated method showed excellent agreement with manual Agatston scores derived from non-contrast CT (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-0.95, p < 0.001, concordance correlation coefficient = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.95). For classifying severe aortic stenosis, defined by calcium scores exceeding 2000 for men and 1300 for women, the approach achieved a sensitivity of 88.6%, specificity of 91.1%, and overall accuracy of 90.0%. This deep learning model provides automated aortic valve calcification quantification with high accuracy on enhanced CT. This approach offers an alternative for measuring aortic valve calcium when non-contrast CT is unavailable, with the potential to reduce reliance on non-contrast CT, minimize operator dependency, and lower patient radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.