ArticleCommunications biology2025
Hierarchical and distinct biological motion processing in macaque visual cortical areas MT and MST.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hierarchical and distinct biological motion processing in macaque visual cortical areas MT and MST.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is widely accepted that biological motion (BM) perception involves the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS). Yet, how individual neurons and neural circuits in pSTS encode BM remains unclear. Here we combined electrophysiological recordings with neural network modeling to elucidate BM computations in two subregions of pSTS. We recorded single-cell activity from the middle temporal area (MT) and the medial superior temporal area (MST) of three macaque monkeys when they viewed point-light displays portraying BM walking in different directions (left vs. right), orientations (upright vs. inverted), and forms (intact vs. scrambled). We found that, while individual neurons in both MT and MST showed selectivity for these features, neural populations in MST but not MT exhibit BM-specific encoding, i.e., preferential representation of intact upright BM-the defining characteristic of BM recognition. A neural network model trained to replicate these neurophysiological findings implicated that, BM-specific encoding in MST may arise from feedforward connectivity patterns, i.e., MT subpopulations selective for linear translational motion and nonlinear optic flow projected preferentially to distinct MST cells. Taken together, our findings highlight hierarchical and distinct BM processing in MT and MST, advancing our understanding of BM computations in pSTS at the single-cell and neural circuit levels in the primate brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.