ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparing ISO 4049 and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy for assessing ambient light sensitivity in dental resin composites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the sensitivity of dental resin composites to ambient light using the ISO 4049 standard and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. It aimed to compare the working times measured by these two methods to assess FTIR's potential as an alternative to ISO 4049 for determining premature polymerization. Eight dental composites (three bulk-fill and five conventional) were exposed to simulated ambient light. Working time was assessed using the method described in ISO 4049 standard, which identifies premature polymerization via visually identifiable macroscopic changes. FTIR spectroscopy enabled an analysis of the progress of polymerization by measuring the degree of conversion of methacrylate C=C bonds. Working times were compared across composites and between methods, with statistical analyses performed using ANOVA and Pearson correlation. All composites met the minimum ISO 4049 working time of 60 s. However, significant differences in working times were noted between ISO 4049 and FTIR, with FTIR generally overestimating the working time. Pearson correlation indicated moderate alignment between the methods, particularly at higher working times, though FTIR was less sensitive to early polymerization changes compared to ISO 4049. In conclusion, FTIR spectroscopy shows potential for assessing ambient light sensitivity in dental resin composites, yet it lacks the sensitivity of ISO 4049 in detecting early-stage polymerization. This study underscores the need for standardized, sensitive methods in assessing resin composites' working times, especially as material compositions evolve in modern dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.