ArticleScientific reports2025
Utilizing SMOTE-TomekLink and machine learning to construct a predictive model for elderly medical and daily care services demand.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effectiveness of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Healthcare Service Quality Metrics: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Research on features selection of medical diagnostic models based on L-S-ACO algorithm.iScience · 2026Article
- Predicting metabolic syndrome in adolescents from device-measured 24-h movement behaviors: a machine learning approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Role perceptions and willingness to engage among older adults in the context of active aging: a qualitative study in Dalian, China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Artificial neural network-driven approaches to improved forecasting of disability care expenditures in an aging Kingdom of Saudi Arabia population.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lung cancer risk prediction using augmented machine learning pipelines with explainable AI.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Models Using CT Radiomics for Predicting Post-Vertebral Augmentation Residual Back Pain in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to construct a prediction model for the demand for medical and daily care services of the elderly and to explore the factors that affect the demand for medical and daily care services of the elderly. In this study, a questionnaire survey on the demand for medical and daily care services of 1291 elderly was conducted using multi-stage stratified whole cluster random sampling. SPSS21.0 statistical analysis software was used to describe the basic data of the elderly statistically, and univariate analysis was used to screen variables for model construction and binary logistic regression analysis. The acquired dataset has class imbalance, and to handle this issue, Synthetic Minority Over Sampling Technique with TomekLink (SMOTE-TomekLink) was adopted to resample the dataset for class-balancing. To improve computational efficiency, we used three algorithms to develop prediction models, including Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) algorithms. The performance of each model was measured, and the performance of the prediction model was obtained using the following performance metrics: accuracy (ACC), recall (R), precision (P), F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC). The prediction models for the medical and daily care services demand of the elderly were developed and validated using 12 and 13 key features, respectively. The LightGBM algorithm emerged as the superior prediction model for estimating the service needs of the elderly. For the medical service demand prediction model, LightGBM achieved an AUC of 0.910 and F1-score of 0.841. In the daily care services demand prediction model, LightGBM demonstrated an AUC of 0.906 and an F1-score of 0.819. In the LightGBM model, the analysis of feature importance indicates that the number of chronic diseases, education level, and financial sources emerge as the most significant predictors for the demand of healthcare services, encompassing both medical and daily care services. Based on questionnaire information combined with feature selection, unbalanced data processing and machine learning methods, this study constructed a machine learning model for predicting the demand for medical and daily care services for the elderly, and analyzed the influencing factors of the demand for medical and daily care services for the elderly, providing a reference for the construction and verification of future prediction models for the demand for medical and daily care services for the elderly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.