Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069292›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2025

Interactions and evolutionary relationships among bacterial mobile genetic elements.

Andrew S Lang, Alison Buchan, Vincent Burrus

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Antimicrobial Resistance in Mycobacteria.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew S LangDepartment of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. aslang@mun.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4510-7683
Alison BuchanDepartment of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA. abuchan@utk.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7420-985X
Vincent BurrusDépartement de Biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. vincent.burrus@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6318-6904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile genetic elements (MGEs) have profound influence on the ecology and evolution of organisms, including bacteria. During the past two decades, a great number of new types of MGEs have been discovered that now seem to be prevalent in diverse bacterial lineages. With the rapid discovery of new categories of MGEs comes an array of new acronyms that present a challenge to grasp. Moreover, it is now clear that there are complex evolutionary connections and molecular interactions among MGEs, and that these entities are not discrete, independent genetic elements acting in isolation. Different types of MGEs share and exchange genes, and coresident MGEs interact with each other within cells, in both cooperative and antagonistic ways. This all greatly affects the end results that are felt by the host organism. In this Review, we strive to clarify emerging bacterial MGE terms and elements while also presenting a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge landscape regarding MGEs in bacteria, their evolutionary relationships and interactions with their host and with one another.

Indexed as

BacteriaEvolution, MolecularInterspersed Repetitive SequencesGene Transfer, HorizontalGenome, Bacterial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.