Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069277›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multi blockchain architecture for judicial case management using smart contracts.

Tahir Alyas, Qaiser Abbas, Sadia Niazi, Saad Said Alqahtany, Turki Alghamdi, Ali Alzahrani, Nadia Tabassum, Aidarus Mohamed Ibrahim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tahir AlyasDepartment of Computer Science, Lahore Garrison University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Qaiser AbbasFaculty of Computer and Information Systems, Islamic University of Madinah, 42351, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Sadia NiaziDepartment of Psychology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Saad Said AlqahtanyFaculty of Computer and Information Systems, Islamic University of Madinah, 42351, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Turki AlghamdiFaculty of Computer and Information Systems, Islamic University of Madinah, 42351, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AlzahraniFaculty of Computer and Information Systems, Islamic University of Madinah, 42351, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Nadia TabassumDepartment of Computer Science, Virtual University of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Aidarus Mohamed IbrahimCollege of Computing and IT, University of Hargeisa, Hargeisa, Somalia. aidarusibrahim11@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The infusion of technology across various domains, particularly in process-centric and multi-stakeholder sectors, demands transparency, accuracy, and scalability. This paper introduces a blockchain and intelligent contract-based framework for judicial case management, proposing a private-to-public blockchain approach to establish a transparent, decentralized, and robust system. An Integrated Solution for Judicial Case Management using Blockchain Technology and Smart Contracts. This paper aims to introduce a multi-blockchain structure for managing judicial cases based on smart contracts, ultimately rendering cases more transparent, distributed, and tenacious. This solution is innovative because it will leverage both private and public blockchains to satisfy the unique requirements of judicial processes, with transparent public access for authorized digital events and transactions occurring on the freely available blockchain and a three-tiered private blockchain structure to address private stakeholder interactions while ensuring that operational consistency, security, and data privacy requirements are met. Leveraging the decentralized and tamper-proof approach of blockchain and cloud computing, the framework aims to increase data security and cut down on administrative burdens. This framework offers a scalable and secure solution for modernizing judicial systems, supporting smart governance's shift towards digital transparency and accountability.

Indexed as

Blockchain technologyData privacyDecentralizationJudicial case managementMulti-blockchain architectureSmart contracts

Identifiers

PMID40069277
PMCPMC11897372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.