Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069251›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Monkeys increase scratching when encountering unexpected good fortune.

Sakumi Iki, Ikuma Adachi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sakumi IkiCenter for the Evolutionary Origins of Human Behavior, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi, Japan. sakumi.iki@gmail.com.
Ikuma AdachiCenter for the Evolutionary Origins of Human Behavior, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP19K12730Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22KJ1783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidating how ancestral behavioural traits have been repurposed for psychological and social functions is critical to advancing our understanding of human behavioural evolution. Self-scratching, originally a hygienic response and known to exhibit social contagion, serves as a model for this process. Although human scratching behaviour is traditionally linked to negative emotions, evidence from non-human animals has produced inconsistent results, casting doubt on its association with negative emotions. Here, we examined scratching in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) during cognitive tasks. In Experiment 1, we manipulated reward outcomes by introducing rare, unexpected increases ("fortunate" condition) or omissions ("unfortunate" condition) of rewards; scratching increased significantly under the fortunate condition, but not the unfortunate one. In Experiment 2, we presented unexpected visual stimuli without altering reward outcomes and observed increased scratching. Our results challenge the traditional view that scratching is primarily linked to negative emotions. Our findings suggest that scratching, which originally evolved as a response to unexpected skin stimulation, may later have been repurposed as a coping mechanism to manage heightened uncertainty.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalMacaca fuscataAnimalsBiological EvolutionNeuropsychological TestsRewardCoping strategyEvolutionExaptationJapanese macaquesSelf-directed behaviourSurprisal

Identifiers

PMID40069251
PMCPMC11897401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.