ArticleScientific reports2025
A two stage blood cell detection and classification algorithm based on improved YOLOv7 and EfficientNetv2.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current diagnoses of leukemia are typically performed manually by physicians on the basis of blood cell morphology, leading to challenges such as excessive workload, limited efficiency, and subjective outcomes. To solve the above problems, a two-stage detection method was developed for the automatic detection and identification of blood cells. First, for the blood cell detection task, an improved YOLOv7 blood cell detection model was proposed that integrates multihead attention and the SCYLLA-IoU (SIoU) loss function to accurately locate and classify white blood cells (WBCs), red blood cells (RBCs), and platelets in a full-field image of blood cells. For the white blood cell identification task of detecting network positioning, an improved EfficientNetv2 classification model was subsequently developed, which integrates the atrous spatial pyramid pooling (ASPP) module to increase classification accuracy and employs the balanced cross-entropy (BCE) function to address sample number imbalance. The experiments utilized four publicly accessible datasets: BCCD, LDWBC, LISC, and Raabin. The proposed detection model achieved an average accuracy of 94.7% in detecting and identifying blood cells in the BCCD dataset. With an IoU equal to 0.5, the model attained a mean average precision (mAP) of 97.17%. In the white blood cell classification task, an average precision (AP) of 95.12% and an average recall (AR) of 97% were achieved on the LDWBC, LISC, and Raabin datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed two-stage detection method detects and identifies blood cells accurately, thereby facilitating automatic detection, classification, and quantification of blood cell images, which can aid doctors in preliminary leukemia diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.