ArticleScientific reports2025
Impaired myocardial deformation and aortic distensibility by cardiac MRI in girls with Turner syndrome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Girls and women with Turner syndrome (TS) suffer from increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. We hypothesized that left ventricular (LV) myocardial strain and aortic elasticity will be impaired in girls with TS. Cardiac MRI of 45 girls with TS and 14 healthy control girls was performed. Tissue tracking was used to assess LV Global Longitudinal (GLS), circumferential (GCS), radial short and long axes (GRS SAX and GRS LAX) in patients compared to controls. Maximal and minimal aortic areas were measured in ascending aorta, proximal descending, and aorta at diaphragm. Regional strain and distensibility were calculated using previously validated formulas. Comparisons were made between patients with and without bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Inter-observer agreement was assessed for myocardial strain and aortic strain and distensibility. Results of the study showed GLS was significantly impaired in TS patients - 15.6 ± 1.8% compared to the control group - 17.2 ± 1%, p value = 0.013. No significant differences were observed in other strain parameters. Aortic diameter was similar in patients and control groups. Ascending aorta strain and distensibility were significantly lower in TS patients (33 ± 19% and 9.1 ± 5.5 mm Hg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.