ArticleScientific data2025
A comprehensive dataset of magnetic resonance enterography images with intestinal segment annotations.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semi-Automatic Assessment of Crohn's Disease Activity by Combined Analysis of Bowel Lesions and Creeping Fat.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Imaging in inflammatory bowel disease 2025: ECCO-ESGAR-ESP-IBUS diagnostic and monitoring recommendations with MRI and intestinal ultrasound in treat-to-target strategies.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- Multimodal deep learning for inflammatory bowel disease: a new frontier in cellular and molecular biomarker discovery to clinical translation.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Large-scale convolutional neural network for clinical target and multi-organ segmentation in gynecologic brachytherapy via multi-stage learning.Medical physics · 2025Article
- A comprehensive dataset of magnetic resonance enterography images with intestinal segment annotations.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a recurrent bowel disease that usually requires magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) for diagnosis and monitoring. However, recognition of bowel segments from MRE images by a radiologist is challenging and time-consuming. Deep learning-based medical image segmentation has shown the potential to reduce manual effort and provide automated tools to assist in disease management; however, it requires a large-scale fine-annotated dataset for training. To address this gap, we collected MRE data, including half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo(HASTE) sequences with coronal orientation, from 114 patients with IBD, who received 1600-2000 mL of 2.5% mannitol. The bowel images per patient were contoured and annotated into ten segments (stomach, duodenum, small intestine, appendix, cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum), with fine pixel-level annotations labeled by experienced radiologists. Furthermore, we validated the efficiency of several state-of-the-art segmentation methods using this dataset. This study established a high-quality, publicly available whole-bowel segment MR dataset with benchmark results and laid the groundwork for AI research on IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.