ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025
'I'm glad my baby has weaned so I don't need to make that decision.' Understanding breastfeeding-related COVID-19 vaccine narratives on social media.
Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health promotion in the algorithmic age: recognizing the information environment as a determinant of health.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- 'I'm glad my baby has weaned so I don't need to make that decision.' Understanding breastfeeding-related COVID-19 vaccine narratives on social media.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
issue addressedDuring the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the infodemic has been highly visible. Vaccine-related advice and evidence-based guidelines for breastfeeding women have lagged, and, at times have been contradictory and confusing. Breastfeeding is an important public health issue with long-lasting health benefits for infants and mothers. This online social listening study aimed to understand breastfeeding-related narratives on social media during the early stages of the Australian COVID-19 vaccine roll-out.
methodsPublic content about breastfeeding and COVID-19 vaccines from Facebook pages with Australian-based administrators were accessed via the CrowdTangle platform. All related content posted between 1 December 2020-31 December 2021 was included. Content (n = 29 567) was coded to an adapted vaccine narrative typology, and emergent themes were inductively identified.
resultsMost posts were promoting, sharing or discussing reliable information. However, the comments responding to these posts varied more widely. Several consistent questions, concerns, and information voids were evident, and misinformation and conflicting information contributed to confusion and challenges with decision-making.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the complexities associated with decision-making. Pregnant and breastfeeding women continue to be a priority group for vaccination, yet there were gaps in data, evidence and information. Incorporating social listening and infodemic management into public health work is important. SO WHAT?: Information voids, when identified early, can help inform public health messaging. Increasing social listening and infodemic training and skills in the health promotion workforce can help build future capacity and give insight into optimising public health communication and addressing misinformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.