ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Allergic Contact Dermatitis Induced by Modern Wound Dressings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Risks and Allergenic Components.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Meta-analysis on the safety and efficacy of different dressings in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern wound dressings have revolutionised wound care, offering optimal healing environments. However, their widespread use has led to a significant increase in allergic reactions, particularly among patients with chronic leg ulcers. The complex chemical compositions of these dressings can trigger allergic responses. This study investigated allergens in wound dressings for leg ulcers. A comprehensive analysis of seventy-three commonly used dressings in Belgium identified prevalent allergenic components across various types. A centralised database was created to catalogue this information. The study found that hydrocolloids and hydrogels are more likely to cause allergies due to substances like, colophony and propyleneglycol respectively. Hydrofibre, alginate and nonadhesive dressings demonstrated lower risks. Carboxymethylcellulose emerged as a frequent allergen. Patch-testing for patients with leg ulcers is recommended to better identify specific allergens. This study helps healthcare professionals select the most suitable dressings, reducing allergy risks and improving wound healing. However, current legislation limits access to the full composition of dressings, hindering the identification of all potential allergens. Overall, this study is a significant step towards understanding and addressing allergy risks associated with wound dressings, improving care for patients with leg ulcers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.