ArticleChinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi2026
Dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flaps for traumatic soft tissue defect of finger: A prospective anatomical and clinical study.
Article in Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAnatomical studies provide the foundation for surgical advancements, particularly in perforator-based procedures. Despite safety measures, hand injuries continue to occur, making reconstructive surgery essential for improving quality of life. Magnification techniques have transformed plastic surgery, aiding perforator-based surgeries and improving outcomes. This study aims to bridge the gap in anatomical knowledge and explore the potential benefits of dorsal metacarpal artery flap.
methodsThis prospective study, conducted from July 2021 to June 2023, focused on the dorsal metacarpal artery perforators in fresh frozen cadavers. Fresh un-embalmed cadavers without signs of trauma or deformity to the upper limb were included. The anatomical study comprised the process of injecting red latex into the arteries located at the wrist, followed by dissection and measurements of number of perforators, calibre, distance of perforators from metacarpal head, and radial styloid. In the clinical phase, hand held Doppler was used to locate the perforators of the metacarpal arteries between metacarpal heads. Based on these perforators, flaps were raised for the patients with defects over the proximal fingers. Details about defect and flap and patients characteristics were tabulated and presented.
resultsThe study was carried out on 6 fresh frozen cadavers (12 hands). Anatomical findings revealed the anatomical location, calibre, and consistent number of metacarpal artery perforators and dorsal carpal artery perforators supplying the dorsum of the hand. There was one perforator from 1st, 2nd, and 3rd metacarpal arteries. More than 1 perforators was found originating from 4th and 5th metacarpal arteries. Perforator of 1st metacarpal artery was largest in size (1.23 ± 0.27) mm. The study included 25 patients with finger defects. Metacarpal artery perforator flaps were planned to cover these defects. Successful outcome were achieved in 92% of patients.
conclusionPerforator-based flaps are effective for small to medium-sized hand defects, reducing the need for distant pedicled flaps. These flaps provide functional and aesthetic benefits while minimizing donor site complications. The unique anatomical insights from our study include the consistent number and location of dorsal metacarpal artery perforators, as well as their relation to key landmarks such as the juncturae tendineae and 2 bony prominences (first metacarpal head and radial styloid process).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.