ArticleThoracic cancer2025
Quality Indicators for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Queensland, Australia, 2012-2021.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Uneven Ground: Survival Differences Among Victorian Lung Cancer Patients by Location of Residence (2011-2023): A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundQuality indicators for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been implemented in Queensland, Australia, to assess performance across 28 elements relating to diagnosis, access, treatment, and outcomes.
methodsLinked data were sourced from the population-based Queensland Oncology Repository. Eligible people were diagnosed with NSCLC between 2012 and 2021, with follow-up on treatment and mortality available to 31 December 2022. For each indicator, changes between 2012-2016 and 2017-2021 were assessed by fitting a multivariable Poisson regression model. Results from the models were expressed in terms of the relative likelihood (RL) using 2012-2016 as the reference period.
resultsRecords were included for a total of 20 449 individuals. Significant improvements over the study period were observed for several indicators, including: review by a multidisciplinary team (RL = 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07); any anticancer treatment received (RL = 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.06); radiation therapy for inoperable early-stage NSCLC (RL = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11); concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for stage III disease (RL = 1.35, 95% CI 1.24-1.47); and intravenous systemic therapy (IVST) for metastatic NSCLC (RL = 1.18, 95% CI 1.13-1.22). Two-year survival from the time of surgery increased from 85% to 90% (p < 0.001). In contrast, fewer people had their performance status documented following MDT review during the latter period (RL = 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96), and there was a decrease in people from rural/remote areas who received their first treatment within 30 days of diagnosis (RL = 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97).
conclusionsThe endorsed suite of quality indicators offers essential benchmarking to enable ongoing monitoring of and improvement in the quality of lung cancer care in Queensland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.