ArticleJournal of audiology & otology2025
Exploring the Amplitudes of Binaural Interaction Components Elicited by Diverse Stimuli and Their Relationships With Behavioral Measures in Individuals With Normal Hearing.
Article in Journal of audiology & otology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of interaural time and level differences on the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response in Cope's gray treefrogs.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026Article
- Latency Characteristics of Auditory Brainstem Responses to Click and LS CE-Chirp Stimuli Under Monaural and Binaural Conditions.Journal of audiology & otology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThis study was performed to comprehensively examine the amplitudes of the binaural interaction components (BICs) elicited by chirps, clicks, and 500 Hz tone-burst stimuli in individuals with normal hearing. Electrophysiological evidence of BICs was obtained and assessed for correlations with interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD). SUBJECTS AND
methodsSixteen adults (4 males and 12 females) with normal hearing participated in this study. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to chirp, click, and 500 Hz tone-burst stimuli were recorded, and BICs were derived based on wave V. The behavioral thresholds of ITDs and ILDs across multiple frequencies were obtained and analyzed.
resultsBICs were found in most participants, regardless of stimulus type. The amplitudes of BICs elicited by chirps were the highest, followed by those elicited by clicks and 500 Hz tone-bursts. A significant correlation was found between the amplitudes of chirp-evoked BICs and the thresholds of 500 Hz ITDs and ILDs.
conclusionsThis study found that chirp stimuli may be effective in eliciting BIC and predicting behavioral binaural interaction processing at low frequencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.