ArticleComputerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society2025
Encoding 3D information in 2D feature maps for brain CT-Angiography.
Article in Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose learnable 3D pooling (L3P), a CNN module designed to compress 3D information into 2D feature maps using anisotropic convolutions and unidirectional max pooling. Specifically, we used L3P followed by a 2D network to generate predictions from 3D brain CT-Angiography (CTA) in the context of large vessel occlusion (LVO). To further demonstrate its versatility, we extended its application to 3D brain MRI analysis for brain age prediction. First, we designed an experiment to classify the LVO-affected hemisphere (left or right), projecting the input CTA into the sagittal plane, which allowed to assess the ability of L3P to encode the 3D location where the location information was in the 3D-to-2D compression axis. Second, we evaluated the use of L3P on LVO detection as a binary classification (presence or absence). We compared the L3P models performance to that of 2D and stroke-specific 3D models. L3P models achieved results equivalent to stroke-specific 3D models while requiring fewer parameters and resources and provided better results than 2D models using maximum intensity projection images as input. The generalizability of L3P approach was evaluated on the LVO-affected hemisphere detection using data from a single site for training/validation and data from 36 other sites for testing, achieving an AUC of 0.83 on the test set. L3P also performed comparably or better than a fully 3D network on a brain age prediction task with a separate T1 MRI dataset, demonstrating its versatility across different tasks and imaging modalities. Additionally, L3P models generated more interpretable feature maps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.