ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tools to Manage Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infection: Clinicians' Perspectives in Sri Lanka.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In low-resource settings, providers often manage lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) without diagnostic tests, which may cause antibacterial overuse. Electronic clinical decision support tools (eCDSTs) can support evidence-based decision-making and judicious use of antibacterials. This study aimed to explore the potential of an eCDST to help providers in Sri Lanka effectively manage LRTI. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 clinicians, including 10 males and five females, with an average of 11.6 years (range: 4-25 years) of clinical practice. The interview guide covered clinicians' interest in an eCDST to manage LRTI and their feedback regarding the desired features of such a tool. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for themes related to: interest in an eCDST for LRTI, desired tool capabilities, development concerns, and tool design characteristics. All expressed interest in incorporating eCDSTs into their practice. However, the majority emphasized that clinical judgment must supersede recommendations from an eCDST. Four themes emerged regarding desired tool capabilities: information about the pathogen, treatment recommendations, severity of the LRTI, and monitoring of patient progress. Six themes emerged regarding tool development considerations: validated algorithms, regional specificity, seasonality, inclusion of patient's risk factors, scalability, and the importance of updated and locally relevant recommendations. Participants stressed that the tool design should be simple, timesaving, and internet-independent. Electronic clinical decision support tools are capable of improving patient care and reduce antibiotic overuse, which may impact downstream antibacterial resistance. Future research should develop an eCDST for LRTI with local input and evaluate its impact on appropriate antibacterial use and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.