Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40068172›Full record

Observational studyJMIR medical informatics2025

Prescription Refill Adherence Before and After Patient Portal Registration in Among General Practice Patients in England Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink: Longitudinal Observational Study.

Abrar Alturkistani, Thomas Beaney, Geva Greenfield, Ceire E Costelloe

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abrar AlturkistaniDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, Reynolds Building, London, W6 8RP, United Kingdom, 44 0207589.ORCID 0000-0001-7935-8870
Thomas BeaneyDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, Reynolds Building, London, W6 8RP, United Kingdom, 44 0207589.ORCID 0000-0001-9709-7264
Geva GreenfieldDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, Reynolds Building, London, W6 8RP, United Kingdom, 44 0207589.ORCID 0000-0001-9779-2486
Ceire E CostelloeDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, Reynolds Building, London, W6 8RP, United Kingdom, 44 0207589.ORCID 0000-0002-3475-7525

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient portal use has been associated with improved patient health and improved adherence to medications, including statins. However, there is limited research on the association between patient portal registration and outcomes such as statin prescription refill adherence in the context of the National Health Service of England, where patient portals have been widely available since 2015. Objective: We aimed to explore statin prescription refill adherence among general practice patients in England. Methods: This study was approved by the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Independent Scientific Advisory Committee (ID: 21_000411). We used patient-level general practice data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in England. The data included patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease, who were registered on the patient portal. The primary aim was to investigate whether statin prescription refill adherence, defined as ≥80% adherence based on the medication possession ratio, improved after patient portal registration. We used a multilevel logistic regression model to compare aggregate adherence 12 months before and 12 months after patient portal registration. Results: We included 44,141 patients in the study. The analysis revealed a 16% reduction in the odds of prescription refill adherence 12 months after patient portal registration (odds ratio [OR]: 0.84, 95% CI 0.81-0.86) compared to 12 months before registration in the fully adjusted model for patient- and practice-level variables. Conclusions: This study evaluated prescription refill adherence after patient portal registration. Registering to the portal does not fully explain the mechanisms underlying the relationship between patient portal use and health-related outcomes such as medication adherence. Although a small reduction in prescription refill adherence was observed, this reduction disappeared when the follow up time was reduced to 6 months. Given the limitations of the study, reduction in prescription refill adherence cannot be entirely attributable to patient portal registration. However, there may be potential confounding factors influencing this association which should be explored through future research.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsGeneral PracticePatient PortalsAgedEnglandFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorscardiovascular diseasechronic kidney diseaseclinical practice researchdelivery of health carediabetesEnglandgeneral practicehealth carelongitudinal analysismedicationmedication adherencemedication orderingpatient healthpatient portalpatient portalspersonal health records

Identifiers

PMID40068172
PMCPMC11918981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.