Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40068124›Full record

SynthesisNursing inquiry2025

Identification of Nursing-Sensitive Indicators on Pressure Injuries/Ulcers: A Systematic Review.

Beratiye Oner, Meryem Kilic, Vildan Cakar, Ayise Karadag

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nursing inquiry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beratiye OnerDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Lokman Hekim University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8004-4657
Meryem KilicDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Gaziantep Islam Science and Technology University, Gaziantep, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-5346
Vildan CakarDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0122-7405
Ayise KaradagFaculty of Nursing, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6436-1647

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aims to develop a conceptual framework to identify nursing-sensitive indicators for preventing and managing pressure ulcers. The first step involves defining evidence-based indicators critical to effective prevention and management. The second step examines the relationships influencing the management of these indicators, using insights derived from scientific research findings. This review is guided by a conceptual framework rooted in Structural State Theory and uses a methodological approach. A total of 956 articles were identified through a search of original references from Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL, covering the period from 2012 to 2023. A systematic review of 29 studies identified 241 relationships between dependent and independent variables. A theoretical conceptual framework highlighted nursing-sensitive indicators (independent variables) related to patients, nurses, pressure injury/ulcer management, organizational structure, and their association with pressure injury/ulcer outcomes (dependent variables). The analysis showed that patient-focused studies had the highest frequency of relationships. This review highlights the complexity of managing pressure injuries/ulcers and the essential role of nursing care practices and interventions in shaping outcomes. The findings highlight the need for specialized wound care nurses and further research on nursing interventions, urging hospitals to invest in structural changes and nurse education.

Indexed as

Pressure UlcerHumansindicatornursingpressure injurypressure ulcer

Identifiers

PMID40068124
PMCPMC11896604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.