Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40067883›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Predicting the diversity of photosynthetic light-harvesting using thermodynamics and machine learning.

Callum Gray, Samir Chitnavis, Tamara Buja, Christopher D P Duffy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Callum GrayDigital Environment Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7276-4881
Samir ChitnavisDigital Environment Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Tamara BujaDigital Environment Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher D P DuffyDigital Environment Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

BBSRCLeverhulme Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxygenic photosynthesis is responsible for nearly all biomass production on Earth, and may have been a prerequisite for establishing a complex biosphere rich in multicellular life. Life on Earth has evolved to perform photosynthesis in a wide range of light environments, but with a common basic architecture of a light-harvesting antenna system coupled to a photochemical reaction centre. Using a generalized thermodynamic model of light-harvesting, coupled with an evolutionary algorithm, we predict the type of light-harvesting structures that might evolve in light of different intensities and spectral profiles. We reproduce qualitatively the pigment composition, linear absorption profile and structural topology of the antenna systems of multiple types of oxygenic photoautotrophs, suggesting that the same physical principles underlie the development of distinct antenna structures in various light environments. Finally we apply our model to representative light environments that would exist on Earth-like exoplanets, predicting that both oxygenic and anoxygenic photosynthesis could evolve around low mass stars, though the latter would seem to work better around the coolest M-dwarfs. We see this as an interesting first step toward a general evolutionary model of basic biological processes and proof that it is meaningful to hypothesize on the nature of biology beyond Earth.

Indexed as

Light-Harvesting Protein ComplexesMachine LearningModels, BiologicalPhotosynthesisAlgorithmsComputational BiologyThermodynamicsLight-Harvesting Protein Complexes

Identifiers

PMID40067883
PMCPMC11896073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.