ArticlePloS one2025
Stress and stiffness as predictors of shear wave velocity in peripheral nerve.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sound touch viscosity in the evaluation of median nerve in healthy volunteers-a preliminary study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shear wave elastography (SWE) is a promising non-invasive indicator for diagnosing peripheral neuropathy. Emerging validation studies using ultrasound-based measures of shear wave velocity (SWV) in other biological tissues, such as muscle, demonstrate there is a concern of whether SWE is an accurate measure of tensile stress or stiffness. Distinguishing between these two parameters and their relationship with SWV is crucial if SWE is to be used as a biomarker for peripheral neuropathies, where changes in mechanical properties are known to occur. In this study, we use cat sciatic nerves to first evaluate SWV in situ at knee positions known to reduce (90° flexion) or increase (180° extension) stress, and then excise nerves to directly quantify the relationships between SWV, stress, and stiffness with ex vivo tensile testing. Our ex vivo findings show that although SWV can be predicted using either stress or stiffness, stress explains more variability in sciatic nerve SWV. However, while stress remains the better predictor of SWV ex vivo, within the SWV range established in situ, stiffness improves its accuracy at estimating SWV, especially when also accounting for factors related to nerve viscoelasticity. Therefore, if SWE is to be used in clinical settings as an indicator of nerve stiffness in peripheral neuropathy, it is essential to standardize parameters such as limb positioning and nerve preloading, which could potentially mask pathological changes in nerve stiffness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.