ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed With Sacral Chordoma in a Retrospective Multicenter Study.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and prognostic factors between primary and recurrent sacral chordomas.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of sacral and sacrococcygeal chordomas: a 30-year single-center experience comparing 3 treatment modalities.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2026Article
- Novel application of FiberWire for intervertebral disc transection in en bloc spondylectomy: a case report.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundChordoma is a rare and aggressive primary bone sarcoma. En-block resection remains the primary treatment, but some patients are unable to undergo it due to the location and potential complications. Currently, there is no direct comparison of the effects of radiotherapy (RTH) and surgical treatment. However, retrospective analyses indicate the potential benefits of using RTH.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 48 patients with sacral chordoma who were treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy between 2001-2020. Among those, 22 were initially treated with surgery, 19 with definitive radiotherapy, and 7 received combined treatment. The outcomes of the treatment of recurrence in 16 patients were considered. The resection margins were defined according to R classification, and the Kaplan-Meier method was employed to calculate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsThe median (mOS) for the entire cohort was 80.6 months (95% CI: 62.3-NA), and the median (mDFS) was 40.4 months (95% CI: 35-69.5). Patients who underwent radical surgery of the primary tumor did not achieve the mOS (mean 68), while patients treated only with RTH for the primary tumor achieved an mOS of 62.3 months (95% CI: 52.1-NA). This resulted in a significant advantage of surgery over RTH in terms of OS (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.