ArticlePloS one2025
Cancer screening prevalence and preference among hospitalized women with and without diabetes mellitus.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the prevalence of nonadherence to breast cancer and colorectal cancer screening, associated risk factors, and screening preference among hospitalized women with and without diabetes aged 50-75 years who were cancer-free at baseline.
methodsA prospective study compared women with and without diabetes who were cancer-free (except for skin cancer) at baseline and between 50 and 75 years of age, admitted to the general medical service at an academic center were approached for study participation from December 1, 2014, to May 31, 2017. The study evaluated breast and colorectal cancer screening nonadherence prevalence, preference for screening locale, sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with nonadherence using multivariable logistic regression model.
resultsOf 510 women, 39% had a prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and 36% were African American. Women with diabetes were more likely to have obesity, reliance on assistive devices for ambulation, inability to work (have a disability), and a greater average number of comorbidities compared to women without diabetes. Women with or without diabetes were equally nonadherent with BRC (28% vs 36%, p = 0.6) and CRC (25% vs 28%, p = 0.51) screening guidelines. After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical risk factors, only high risk for CRC (OR = 3.20, 95%CI; 1.03-9.91) was an independent risk factor associated with nonadherence to BRC among hospitalized women with diabetes. Whereas after similar adjustment, age younger than 60 years (OR = 2.91, 95%CI; 1.15-7.35) and current or prior smoking (OR = 2.80, 95%CI; 1.14-6.86) were associated with nonadherence to CRC among women with diabetes. 46% of women with diabetes expressed a preference for in-hospital screening for BRC, while 45% expressed a similar preference for CRC.
conclusionHospitalizations may offer additional screening opportunities as almost half of the women with diabetes preferred undergoing breast and colorectal cancer screening during a hospital stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.