Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40067795›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A cross-sectional survey analysis of patient and family knowledge, confidence, and perceived barriers to reporting patient deterioration.

Lisa Thiele, Arthas Flabouris, Campbell Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient and family activated escalation systems: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa ThieleThe University of Adelaide, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0865-4768
Arthas FlabourisThe University of Adelaide, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Campbell ThompsonThe University of Adelaide, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe knowledge, confidence, and skills of healthcare consumers to identify acute clinical deterioration and appropriately escalate concerns remain largely undetermined. This gap is despite the widespread international introduction of consumer escalation systems intended to provide patients and family an avenue to escalate their concerns if worried about deterioration in their own or relative's condition during a hospital stay.

aimTo explore patient and family knowledge of acute clinical deterioration, and their confidence and perceived barriers to escalating their concerns.

designCross-sectional, in-person, consumer surveys across an Australian acute adult hospital. The study specific survey tool was developed through a multistage process with healthcare consumer input during creation and testing.

methodsQuestions explored healthcare consumer knowledge, confidence, and perceived barriers in association with acute clinical deterioration, recognising deterioration, and escalating concerns. Descriptive and inferential analysis was completed, and knowledge, confidence, and barrier scores established. Association between scores and consumer type, gender, age, education level, prior experience with clinical deterioration or rapid response team review, and hospitalisation history in the last 12 months were assessed using multivariable linear regression.

results133 surveys were completed. Knowledge scores varied across respondents. Awareness of the local consumer escalation system was low. A positive association was identified between knowledge and confidence that diminished with increasing barrier scores. A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.

conclusionsLimitations in patient and family knowledge may impede consumer escalation system success. Increasing knowledge may enhance patient and family confidence to identify deterioration and escalate concerns. However, barriers to consumer escalation decrease this potential. Interventions to increase consumer knowledge should therefore be accompanied by strategies to minimise barriers.

Indexed as

Clinical DeteriorationFamilyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40067795
PMCPMC11896061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.