ArticleJAMA2025
Pridopidine in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: The HEALEY ALS Platform Trial.
Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HEALEY ALS Platform Trial
HEALEY ALS Platform Trial - Regimen D Pridopidine
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- At-Home Versus in-Clinic Vital Capacity Measurement: Insights From the HEALEY ALS Platform Trial.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- The Case for Master Protocols for Rare Neurological Diseases.Annals of neurology · 2026Review
- Pridopidine Mediated Sigma-1 Receptor Activation and Therapeutic Implications in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Isoginkgetin protects against degeneration of ALS motor neurons via regulating the GSK-3β-TFEB signaling axis.Pharmacological research · 2026Article
- Article
- Pridopidine Protects ALS Patient-Derived Neural Progenitor Cells via Sigma-1 Receptor Activation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Speech-based digital endpoints track ALS progression and align with standard clinical outcomes: evidence from the VRG50635 trial.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Autophagy: From Molecular Mechanisms to Disease Regulation and Therapeutic Strategies.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Pridopidine, a Potent and Selective Therapeutic Sigma-1 Receptor (S1R) Agonist for Treating Neurodegenerative Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Targeting the Milieu in Neurodegenerative Disease: Time for "Imprecision Medicine"?Aging and disease · 2025Review
- Pharmacological and Pathological Implications of Sigma-1 Receptor in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- The sigma-1 receptor as a neurohomeostatic decision hub for GABARAP-mediated receptor trafficking and macroautophagy.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Financing drug development via adaptive platform trials.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
88 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal disease. The sigma-1 (σ1) receptor emerged as a target for intervention. Objective: To determine the effects of pridopidine, a σ1-receptor agonist, in ALS. Design, Settings, and Participants: Pridopidine was tested as a regimen of the HEALEY ALS Platform Trial, a phase 2/3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, platform trial. The study was conducted at 54 sites in the US from January 2021 to July 2022 (final follow-up, July 14, 2022). A total of 163 participants with ALS were randomized to receive pridopidine or placebo. An additional 122 concurrently randomized participants were assigned to receive placebo in other regimens and included in the analyses. Interventions: Eligible participants were randomized 3:1 to receive oral pridopidine 45 mg twice daily (n = 121) or matching oral placebo (n = 42) for a planned duration of 24 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was change from baseline through week 24 in ALS disease severity, analyzed using a bayesian shared parameter model, which has components for function (Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale [ALSFRS-R]) and survival that were linked through an integrated estimate of treatment-dependent disease slowing across these 2 components. This was denoted as the disease rate ratio (DRR), with DRR less than 1 indicating a slowing in disease progression on pridopidine relative to placebo. There were 5 key secondary end points: time to 2-point or greater reduction in ALSFRS-R total score among participants with bulbar dysfunction at baseline, rate of decline in slow vital capacity among participants with bulbar dysfunction at baseline, percentage of participants with no worsening in the ALSFRS-R bulbar domain score, time to 1-point or greater change in the ALSFRS-R bulbar domain score, and time to death or permanent assisted ventilation. Results: Among 162 patients (mean age, 57.5 years; 35% female) who were randomized to receive the pridopidine regimen and included in the primary efficacy analysis, 136 (84%) completed the trial. In the primary analysis comparing pridopidine vs the combined placebo groups, there was no significant difference between pridopidine and placebo in the primary end point (DRR, 0.99 [95% credible interval, 0.80-1.21]; probability of DRR <1, 0.55) and no differences were seen in the components of ALSFRS-R or survival. There was no benefit of pridopidine on the secondary end points. In the safety dataset (pridopidine, n = 121; placebo, n = 163), the most common adverse events were falls (28.1% vs 29.3%, respectively) and muscular weakness (24.0% vs 31.7%, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: In this 24-week study, pridopidine did not impact the progression of ALS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04297683, NCT04615923.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.