ArticleOdontology2025
Use of confocal laser scanning microscopy to evaluate the metal ion removal and destabilization of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms by EDTA and etidronic acid.
Article in Odontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of substitution patterns on the antimicrobial properties of pyrrole sulfonamide scaffolds.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
- Biofilms Exposed: Innovative Imaging and Therapeutic Platforms for Persistent Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chelating substances bind to metals, forming stable complexes, rendering these essential ions unavailable for microbial metabolism and community stability in biofilms. This action can contribute to the disinfection in endodontic treatments. Through confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), this study quantified the metal ion removal by chelating agents in Enterococcus faecalis biofilms and assessed the impact on community stability. E. faecalis biofilms were grown for 21 days on acrylic coverslips, which the following were immersed in (n = 10): G1) saline solution (control, 5 min); G2) 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, 3 min); and G3) 9% etidronic acid (Dual Rinse HEDP, 5 min). Next, they were stained with Phen Green FL to identify metals, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to highlight bacterial DNA, and propidium iodide (PI) to mark nucleic acid in cells with damaged membranes. Images were captured (4/sample) by CLSM and analyzed by the software Leica Application Suite X. The individual and total volume of the biofilm-stained components (µm
Indexed as
Identifiers
40067546What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.