Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40067545›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2025

A Participatory Survey to Investigate the Long-Term Effectiveness of Adult Psychiatric Services (PSILEAPS): Baseline Data and Recruitment Experiences.

Tomi Bergström, Tapio Gauffin, Teija Hietasaari, Nina Koivuniemi, Anne Leinonen, Enni Öfverberg, Reetta Viitakoski, Timo Haaraniemi, Katja Partanen, Katariina Rantamaa and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tomi BergströmDepartment of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland. tomi.s.bergstrom@jyu.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-8300-3113
Tapio GauffinFaculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Teija HietasaariDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Kemi, Finland.
Nina KoivuniemiDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Kemi, Finland.
Anne LeinonenDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Kemi, Finland.
Enni ÖfverbergDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Kemi, Finland.
Reetta ViitakoskiDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Kemi, Finland.
Timo HaaraniemiDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Kemi, Finland.
Katja PartanenDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Kemi, Finland.
Katariina RantamaaDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Kemi, Finland.
Vilhelmiina YrjänheikkiDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Kemi, Finland.
Tiina JauhiainenDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Kemi, Finland.
Annika OlliDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Kemi, Finland.
Jouko MiettunenResearch Unit of Population Health, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Jouni PetäjäniemiDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Kemi, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical psychology and psychiatry, traditional hypothesis testing is challenging due to the subjective and contextual nature of the studied phenomenon. To address this, more exploratory and participatory research is needed. This paper reports recruitment experiences and baseline data of a prospective exploratory cohort study with participatory elements, initiated in mental health services in one Finnish region. The primary aims, design, and survey for data collection were developed through community meetings involving local mental health workers, peer experts, and service users. Over 2 weeks, all mental health service users, their care teams, and social network members were asked to share their views on the reasons for needing services and what aspects of treatment have been or could be helpful or unhelpful. Descriptive statistics summarized baseline data, and simple thematic analysis examined field notes on supporting and hindering aspects of the study design. A total of 117 service users, 54 care team members, and 34 social network members participated, with a service user attrition rate of 40-50%. The study achieved 79% of the target sample size. Women and participants with mood disorder diagnoses and long-term service usage were overrepresented. Findings suggest that integrating participatory research into Finnish public mental health services would require additional resources. Despite its limitations, the collected data will facilitate exploratory research into real-life mental health treatment processes from various perspectives.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPatient SelectionAdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAdult psychiatric servicesExploratory cohort studyMental health servicesParticipatory researchRecruitment experiences

Identifiers

PMID40067545
PMCPMC12408686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.