ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2025
Unwanted souvenirs-import routes and pathogen detection of the non-endemic tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l. in Germany.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atlas of ticks (Acari: Argasidae, Ixodidae) in Germany: 2nd data update with focus on introduced and rarely observed species.Experimental & applied acarology · 2026Article
- Genetic and morphological data indicate the occurrence of a Rhipicephalus sp. and the absence of Rhipicephalus linnaei in Pakistan.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ticks of the Genus Rhipicephalus occur worldwide. Especially members of Rh. sanguineus s.l. are primarily associated with dogs. As unwanted souvenirs, they are introduced by dogs into non-endemic areas such as Germany, where they can establish and reproduce indoors. A citizen-science study was conducted between 2019 and 2024, asking interested citizens to report tick infestations and send in travel related tick findings which were associated with dogs and were focused on Rhipicephalus species. Tick species were identified using the 16S rRNA gene and tested for pathogens associated with the genus Rhipicephalus. In addition, each tick introduction was considered as a case and categorized and analyzed individually. During the study period, 44 cases were reported. In 17 cases tick specimens were identified as Rh. sanguineus s.s., Rh. rutilus, Rh. linnaei, Rh. turanicus, and Rh. haemaphysaloides which were imported from other European countries and Sri Lanka. Neither Hepatozoon canis, Ehrlichia canis nor Babesia vogeli were detected in any of the 780 received specimens. In contrast, Rickettsia spp. was detected in 50 specimens from six independent cases, with Rickettsia massiliae being identified in 44 specimens. The import of dogs from abroad as well as travel with dogs lacking appropriate tick prophylaxis are responsible for more than 80% of cases. This Project highlights the risk of introductions of non-endemic tick species. Also, professionals such as veterinarians, animal welfare organizations and pest controllers need to be made aware of the possible introduction of Rhipicephalus spp. to ensure early recognition and rapid elimination of the ticks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.