ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Evaluation of procalcitonin versus conventional inflammatory biomarkers for clinical severity grading in patients with intra-abdominal infection.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role and Importance of Procalcitonin (PCT) Testing in Rational Antibiotic Prescribing and Antibiotic Stewardship Programs.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026Review
- Utility of procalcitonin versus CRP in early sepsis detection.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimWe aimed to evaluate the utility of procalcitonin (PCT) as a biomarker for clinical severity grading of intra-abdominal infections (IAI) in hospital-admitted patients presenting with acute abdomen.
methodsIn this retrospective study, median PCT values were compared with conventional inflammatory biomarkers, including leukocyte count (LC), neutrophil count (NC), and C-reactive protein (CRP), within the patient population.
resultsAmong the 245 patients included in the study, 58 (23.7%) were diagnosed with appendicitis, 54 (22.0%) with diverticulitis, 34 (13.9%) with calculous cholecystitis, and 21 (8.6%) with pancreatitis. Additionally, 60 (24.5%) were diagnosed with non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP), and 18 (7.3%) with gallstones without cholecystitis. Median PCT levels were significantly higher in patients with calculous cholecystitis (p < 0.0001) and pancreatitis (p < 0.0001) compared to those with NSAP. The proportion of patients with a PCT cut-off ≥ 0.04 µg/L was significantly higher across all IAI subgroups compared to the NSAP group. However, 18 (10.8%) of IAI patients exhibited PCT levels ≥ 0.5 µg/L, indicating systemic infection. Spearman's rho analysis revealed a significant correlation between PCT and LC, NC, and CRP in patients with IAI (p < 0.0001). Moreover, median PCT levels were significantly higher in perforation/abscess vs. gangrenous appendicitis (p < 0.01), complicated vs. uncomplicated diverticulitis (p = 0.048), and severe vs. mild cholecystitis (p < 0.001).
conclusionPCT correlates strongly with conventional inflammatory biomarkers in patients with IAI. However, PCT appears to offer limited additional clinical value for guiding therapeutic decisions concerning the initial diagnosis and/or severity grading of IAI in patients admitted with acute abdomen. Further research is warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.