ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
AI classification of knee prostheses from plain radiographs and real-world applications.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The application of artificial intelligence in the design of highly compatible knee prostheses: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Selection of joint replacement methods based on AI cartilage model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered the gold standard treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Common complications associated with TKA include implant loosening and periprosthetic fractures, which often require revision surgery or fixation. Challenges arise when medical records related to the knee prosthesis are lost, making it difficult to plan for revision surgery effectively. This study aims to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system to classify the types of knee prosthetic implants using plain radiographs.
methodsThis retrospective experimental study includes seven types of knee prostheses commonly used in our hospital. The artificial intelligence (AI) system was trained using YOLO (You Only Look Once) version 9, utilizing a dataset of 3228 post-operative and follow-up knee arthroplasty X-ray images. The plain radiographic images were augmented, resulting in a dataset of 25,800 images. Model parameters were fine-tuned to optimize performance for implant classification.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 62.8 years. Right knee arthroplasty was performed in 48.3% of cases, while left knee arthroplasty was performed in 51.7%. The images of knee prostheses comprised 50.9% of the dataset from the anteroposterior (AP) view and 49.1% from the lateral view. The AI model demonstrated exceptional performance metrics, achieving precision, recall, and accuracy rates of 100%, with an F1 score of 1. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated to be 100%.
conclusionThis AI model successfully classifies knee prosthetic implants from plain radiographs. This capability serves as a valuable tool for surgeons, enabling precise planning for revision surgeries and periprosthetic fracture fixation surgery, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes. The high accuracy achieved by the AI underscores its potential to enhance surgical efficiency and effectiveness in managing knee arthroplasty complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.