ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2025
The when, what, and where of naturally-acquired microchimerism.
Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated with Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension Among Hospitalized Females: An Artificial Neural Network Analysis of a National US Cohort.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Microchimerism in the Human Brain, Quantitative Assessment and Single Nuclei Profiling Establish Cell Types and Diversity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Fetal-Onset Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia and Thrombocytopenia Followed by Giant Cell Hepatitis: A Case Report.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Article
- Pregnancy-shaped donor-directed alloimmune recall in husband-to-wife kidney transplantation: an integrative mechanistic framework.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Micro-chimerism: from evolution to revolution.Seminars in immunopathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Naturally acquired microchimerism (Mc) is increasingly recognized as an aspect of normal biology. Maternal-fetal bi-directional exchange during pregnancy creates a Mc legacy for the long-term in both individuals. Maternal Mc in her offspring and Mc of fetal origin in women with previous births are best studied. Other sources include from a known or vanished twin, miscarriage or pregnancy termination, older sibling, or previous maternal pregnancy loss. Mc is pleotropic and protean, present in diverse forms, and changing over time as other aspects of biology. Mc acquired from multiple sources, at different lifespan times, and taking on an array of diverse forms, creates a "forward, reverse, and horizontal inheritance" Mc landscape. Mc is found in adaptive and innate immune cells, as resident tissue-specific cells in a wide variety of human tissues, and among other forms as extracellular vesicles. HLA molecules function in a myriad of ways as key determinants for health and are of central importance in interactions between genetically disparate individuals. Studies of autoimmune disease have firmly established a primary role of HLA molecules. Studies of iatrogenic chimerism have established benefit of donor-recipient HLA-disparity against recurrent malignancy after transplantation. HLA molecules and HLA-relationships of families are therefore of particular interest in seeking to understand the role(s) of Mc at the interface of auto-immunity and healthy allo-immunity. This review will begin by providing perspective on Mc in biology followed by a primary focus on persistent Mc according to the human lifespan, in healthy individuals and with illustrative examples of autoimmune diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40067465What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.