ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Normalization of the percentage of signal recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI in brain tumors.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Meningioma versus dural metastasis: integration of T2*-DSC perfusion-derived percentage signal recovery with conventional and contemporary MRI features and clinical variables.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Percentage signal recovery plus relative cerebral blood volume: a practical dual-parameter strategy for differentiating post-stereotactic radiosurgery tumour progression from radiation necrosis in brain metastases.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The universalizability of the metric percentage of signal recovery (PSR) derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MRI is limited by its dependency of acquisition parameters. In this technical assessment, we tested different reference tissues for PSR normalization and found the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) to have the least inter-patient variability when using a fixed PSR-optimized protocol. A logarithmic normalization using NAWM improved the consistency of PSR values when a cohort of brain tumor patients was analyzed by synthetically changing acquisition parameters (while keeping the protocol uniform within the cohort). Additionally, the NAWM logarithmic normalization was better than no normalization and linear normalization at maintaining the consistency of both values and ranks within the cohort while a synthetic random variation of the acquisition parameter was applied (i.e., with a heterogeneous protocol within the cohort). Future PSR studies may consider reporting logarithmic normalized PSR (nPSR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.