ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Technological mapping of plant-based patents for treating bovine mastitis.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid Bactericidal Activity ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bovine mastitis costs the world's economy an estimated USD 19.7-32 billion annually. Plant-based products have been used as alternative treatments with advantages such as minimal side effects, and no studies have reported the formation of resistant microorganisms. To identify these plant-based products, this study performed a technological mapping of patent applications. We applied the terms 'Mastitis AND Extract' and 'Bovine OR Plant OR Livestock OR Cow' to the Espacenet database to find relevant patents. Following this, we applied the same terms to the International Patent Classification (IPC) to categorize patents according to their technological area of use. We found that private companies were the main applicants, among which Chinese companies comprised the majority (52%) and that Taraxacum was the most cited plant in patents. The main applicant was the Lanzhou Institute with seven patents. The most recurrent IPC was A61k36, which refers to medicinal preparations based on algae, lichens, fungi, or plants. From 2000 onwards, the number of patent filings increased, according to the survey, and in 2015, 31 relevant patent applications were filed. Based on this patent survey, we gained a panoramic view of the plant-based. HIGHLIGHTS: China was the main depository of patent applications involving plants and bovine mastitis. The A61k36 subclass had a higher incidence of applications. Companies represent the primary applicants of patent documents to treat bovine mastitis. The genera Taraxacum, Lonicera, and Astragalus were the most cited in patents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40067429What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.